tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post3866225811930133561..comments2023-11-03T06:35:48.003-05:00Comments on Shark and Shepherd: Judge Kloppenburg's Recusal Distinction Doesn't WorkRick Esenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-292104451752768112016-03-21T14:16:34.938-05:002016-03-21T14:16:34.938-05:00No you don't have it right. I think no one was...No you don't have it right. I think no one was out of line. I think she is being inconsistent however in her implicit criticism of others for doing something that is functionally equivalent to what she did. Rick Esenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-70874333766181194352016-03-21T13:33:47.383-05:002016-03-21T13:33:47.383-05:00Let me get this straight ... Sitting Supreme Court...Let me get this straight ... Sitting Supreme Court Justices have no problem ruling on cases directly impacting the entities which raised and spent millions on their behalf but Kloppenburg was out of line here?<br /><br />Even for you, Professors, this is an incredible feat of legal gymnastics!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com