tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post4495737165112812822..comments2023-11-03T06:35:48.003-05:00Comments on Shark and Shepherd: Curb Your EnthusiasmRick Esenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-24818813402048676072013-06-02T20:01:03.556-05:002013-06-02T20:01:03.556-05:00buy propecia online propecia side effects exaggera...<a href="http://hapna.com/pre/buypropeciaonline/#43891" rel="nofollow">buy propecia online</a> propecia side effects exaggerated - generic propecia vs brand propeciaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-84971288923726187392013-05-12T05:12:03.400-05:002013-05-12T05:12:03.400-05:00Hi, I do believe this is an excellent blog. I stum...Hi, I do believe this is an excellent blog. I stumbledupon it ;) I will return once again since <br />I saved as a favorite it. Money and freedom is the greatest way to change, may you be rich and continue to help other people.<br /><br /><br />Here is my blog; <a href="http://communiteonline.com/groups/rapid-secrets-for-biotechnology-across-the-usa/" rel="nofollow">Biotechnology Courses</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-33658521274718943872013-05-10T12:51:52.787-05:002013-05-10T12:51:52.787-05:00Pretty! This has been an extremely wonderful post....Pretty! This has been an extremely wonderful post. Thank you for providing this info.<br /><br /><br />My webpage <a href="http://www.bijuter.msk.ru/blogs/7880/14079/revealing-rapid-systems-for-biot" rel="nofollow">Biotechnology Courses</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-71060101638042120512010-06-17T10:11:06.226-05:002010-06-17T10:11:06.226-05:00Even Dem operative Xoff says Block isn't a con...Even Dem operative Xoff says Block isn't a <a href="http://uppitywis.org/block-nixon-are-not-convicted-crooks" rel="nofollow">convicted crook</a>, and his <a href="http://thexofffiles.blogspot.com/2006/07/being-married-heterosexual-means-never.html" rel="nofollow">2006 blog post</a> tells more details and links to the people involved.Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-27648018354114439082010-06-15T12:43:30.551-05:002010-06-15T12:43:30.551-05:00Sorry, Anony, those words are out there. From the...Sorry, Anony, those words are out there. From the DPW web site <a href="http://www.wisdems.org/release_details.asp?id=401" rel="nofollow">press release</a>, it says "Duffy is sponsored by the convicted criminal fundraiser and Tea Party Toady Mark Block, who yesterday even GOP spokesman and right-wing radio talk show host Charlie Sykes called a "two-bit political operative" " and "Now, following the path of the criminal Mark Block, Duffy is using some two-bit math himself" and in a linked <a href="http://www.wisdems.org/release_details.asp?id=340" rel="nofollow">DPW press release</a>, it says "Duffy is no stranger to bagging money in Milwaukee. Last year he went there under the watchful eye of disgraced criminal fundraiser Mark Block, who threw his own fundraising bash for the reality television contestant last year. Block is the criminal "Tea Party" leader who was fined $15,000 for a scheme in which he funneled money from rich, out-of-state donors to a Wisconsin Supreme Court campaign. Block was banned from involvement in campaign work because of his criminal enterprises, but surfaced to work for Duffy. [para] "In some smoke-filled room, the Republican czars have decided to ignore the democratic voice of their members on behalf of a candidate entirely out-of-touch with the working people of northern Wisconsin," Democratic Party of Wisconsin Chair Mike Tate said Thursday. "Shouldn't northern Wisconsin voters be in charge of picking their own Congressman, not criminal fundraisers or fat cats in Milwaukee?"<br /><br />In other words, Prof. H.R. Shh 'n Shh is defending an MTV reality star who succeeded Gableman as Ashland County's DA, who now wants to be congressman of the seventh district.<br /><br />Standard Contradictory Disclaimer™: <i>I appreciate that the boys and girls that do this kind of work (on my side as well) aren't playing beanbag.</i> (Not that I'm doing this kind of work! I'm civil! <i>But these attacks are another matter and may themselves have legal consequences.</i> Have I forgotten to mention this week that Gableman's ads should be free to say whatever they want and paid for by anyone, even if they are false or misleading?)<br /><br />P.S. My flowery link above seems to have been broken. Richter's March 31 2007 blog on Wilcox can be viewed in the <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:eXhJ9_IlWxMJ:blogs.newberlinnow.com/inside_new_berlin/archive/tags/political%2Bcampaign%2Bscandal/default.aspx&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us" rel="nofollow">Google cache</a> until CMI manages to restore her disappeared posts.Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-49273318778347105682010-06-15T10:40:57.042-05:002010-06-15T10:40:57.042-05:00As far as I have been able to find out, Mike Tate ...As far as I have been able to find out, Mike Tate didn't call Mark Block a "convicted criminal." The challenged statements, one of them by Tate, refer to a "criminal fundraiser" and a guy with a "criminal history of fundraising." Is it false to say that, even before his recent brush with the law in Nevada, O.J. Simpson was a criminal -- had a criminal history of murdering his wife? Block conceded that the State may be able to prove facts that constituted a crime. If Block in fact committed a crime, is it false to say he's a criminal? An individual can be truthfully labelled a "criminal" just as O.J. can be truthfully labelled a "murderer" whether or not they've been held to account for offenses against society in criminal court. And if Block feels he's been defamed, he can sue, and the defense would be that he had, in fact, committed a crime. <br /><br />Don't look for that lawsuit to be filed any time soon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-16300608210164366092010-06-15T09:33:54.908-05:002010-06-15T09:33:54.908-05:00Wow, what a lawyer! Clintonesque! It's a goo...Wow, what a lawyer! Clintonesque! It's a good thing Tate didn't say something like "Mark Block found a loophole." <br /><br />How about "Mark Block agreed to pay $15,000 out of the goodness of his heart. He wanted to contribute the money to the orphans who beg for crusts outside the RPW HQ, but the State Elections Board wouldn't let him!"<br /><br />Here's a different take on the Wilcox/Block/Wigderson violations, one that doesn't <a href="http://blogs.newberlinnow.com/inside_new_berlin/archive/2007/03/31/Weiss_2C00_-WCVP_2C00_-Wilcox-Campaign-Scandal.aspx" rel="nofollow">use the flowery language</a> to make the client look innocent of any wrongdoing, or as you put it, mutually assured destruction, at least as much as $200,000 can buy.<br /><br />Summarizes that account, "Weiss was not personally fined by the State Elections Board, but the stink of the Wisconsin Coalition for Voter Participation activity sticks with him. Documents disclose only four people, including Weiss, active in the Coalition organization. And their single activity as a group resulted in one of the largest fines for political corruption in Wisconsin at the time."<br /><br />Standard Contradictory Disclaimer™: <i>The irony is that the statement about Block may itself be a crime. [...] Now I don't think that Mike Tate should be criminally charged.</i> (But I'll blog about it, and quote the statute and the penalty, just to look menacing. And to think they aren't even paying me to do this! I'll do it for the occasional lunch!)Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.com