tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post5852267271979760421..comments2023-11-03T06:35:48.003-05:00Comments on Shark and Shepherd: Shark at MACRick Esenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-13930951529532316192008-03-14T20:32:00.000-05:002008-03-14T20:32:00.000-05:00cf. Bogos on "illusory tenant".lolI'd like to comm...<I>cf. Bogos on "illusory tenant".</I><BR/><BR/>lol<BR/><BR/>I'd like to commend Atty. Berres on his dry sense of humor (which I've noticed before).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-36069871712566508012008-03-14T13:44:00.000-05:002008-03-14T13:44:00.000-05:00I can roll with that. When I was Developments edi...I can roll with that. When I was Developments editor of the Harvard Law Review, we had a t-shirt made that said "We are Devo" with an appropriate picture. I wish I still had it although I have to admit it might fit.Rick Esenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-82959381685002844312008-03-14T11:27:00.000-05:002008-03-14T11:27:00.000-05:00cf. Bogos on "illusory tenant".cf. Bogos on "<A HREF="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9507E2D9143BF936A25751C1A963948260" REL="nofollow">illusory tenant</A>".Terrence Berreshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02867275234105879358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-20518033514772074792008-03-14T09:33:00.000-05:002008-03-14T09:33:00.000-05:00Not bad, but see D. Papke's citations to Devo in P...Not bad, but see D. Papke's citations to Devo in Property.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-91077222376654965742008-03-14T09:01:00.000-05:002008-03-14T09:01:00.000-05:00Thanks, Jonathan. Unfortunately, anon, there is no...Thanks, Jonathan. Unfortunately, anon, there is no audio or video.<BR/><BR/>IT would be happy to know that I somehow managed to work Bjork into Civil Procedure this year.Rick Esenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-10342138905526603292008-03-14T08:41:00.000-05:002008-03-14T08:41:00.000-05:00"Tibet! Tibet!"Oh sorry I thought you said Bjorkin..."Tibet! Tibet!"<BR/><BR/>Oh sorry I thought you said <A HREF="http://sport.guardian.co.uk/breakingnews/feedstory/0,,-7380736,00.html" REL="nofollow">Bjorking</A>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-75130440827129708162008-03-13T16:20:00.000-05:002008-03-13T16:20:00.000-05:00Which is more reprehensible -- swiftboating or bor...Which is more reprehensible -- swiftboating or borking?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-91239364363692567522008-03-13T13:19:00.000-05:002008-03-13T13:19:00.000-05:00Suhr on AgencyWisconsin Practice Series, v.14.<I>Suhr on Agency</I><BR/><BR/>Wisconsin Practice Series, v.14.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-84322705872837389742008-03-13T12:43:00.000-05:002008-03-13T12:43:00.000-05:00Jonathan: see Suhr on agency.Jonathan: see <A HREF="http://gop3.com/2008/02/20/several-thoughts-on-the-supreme-court-race/#comments" REL="nofollow">Suhr on agency</A>.Terrence Berreshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02867275234105879358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-77962425448930267282008-03-13T12:16:00.000-05:002008-03-13T12:16:00.000-05:00Good thing they're not "agencies."Good thing they're not "agencies."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-43246337337201803062008-03-13T12:11:00.000-05:002008-03-13T12:11:00.000-05:00"Why does the (mandatory) bar have to do the monit..."Why does the (mandatory) bar have to do the monitoring?"<BR/><BR/>Good rhetorical question. The minutes of the August 17, 2007 meeting the State Bar's Professionalism Committee include this in President Basting's briefing about the committee.<BR/><BR/>"These oversight committees are 501c3s, are independent, and are non-profits with no affiliation to the bar or Supreme Court.<BR/> <BR/>...<BR/> <BR/>"Any campaign oversight committee / task force formed would be a separate, independent, permanent group. Its funding would come from a variety of sources; such as grants."Terrence Berreshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02867275234105879358noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-53943909026503194302008-03-13T06:57:00.000-05:002008-03-13T06:57:00.000-05:00Mr. Sample lost me with his references to "swift-b...<I>Mr. Sample lost me with his references to "swift-boating" and corporate influence, etc. ... Are there no blogs?</I><BR/><BR/>There are.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://illusorytenant.blogspot.com/2008/02/song-of-vulgar-boatmen.html" REL="nofollow">Swiftboating</A>.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://illusorytenant.blogspot.com/2008/02/result-orientation-good-wmc-kind.html" REL="nofollow">Corporate influence</A>.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-61199986458794323642008-03-12T07:45:00.000-05:002008-03-12T07:45:00.000-05:00Is this panel going to be available anywhere for d...Is this panel going to be available anywhere for download, viewing, or listening for those of us who couldn't make it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com