tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post6599014697423218842..comments2023-11-03T06:35:48.003-05:00Comments on Shark and Shepherd: Rick Esenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-86028522131473789052011-07-26T21:25:42.706-05:002011-07-26T21:25:42.706-05:00I think that is one of the such a lot vital info f...I think that is one of the such a lot vital info for me. And i am happy reading your article. But wanna remark on some common issues, The website taste is wonderful, the articles is truly excellentHP Laptop Batterieshttp://www.koobox.ca/laptop-batteries/hp-compaq-laptop-batteries.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-45944425025390117252011-07-26T21:04:23.373-05:002011-07-26T21:04:23.373-05:00Good site! I really love how it is simple on my ey...Good site! I really love how it is simple on my eyes and the data are well written. I am wondering how I could be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your feed which must do the trick! Have a nice day!Toshiba Laptop Batterieshttp://www.koobox.ca/laptop-batteries/toshiba-laptop-batteries.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-36962103589881279262010-12-06T14:32:50.101-06:002010-12-06T14:32:50.101-06:00Professor McAdams:
The defendant has no duty to s...Professor McAdams:<br /><br />The defendant has no duty to support his claim that the plaintiff is wrong unless the plaintiff has managed to support his claim in a matter that is adequate to go to the jury. Currently, if the plaintiffs rested their case, their claim asserting that God exists would be thrown out for failure to substantiate the initial claim. The defendant would have to do nothing.<br /><br />When there is some evidence for any gods, get back to us. Until then, your case is dismissed without prejudice.Free Lunchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12272965187978654322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-72050569989270467272010-12-04T15:38:30.743-06:002010-12-04T15:38:30.743-06:00The phrase "evangelistic atheist" recall...The phrase "evangelistic atheist" recalled a visit to New Zealand earlier this year. Dawkins spoke to a sellout crowd of several thousand and received a rock star's reception. In Christchurch, btw. There are now NZ billboards proclaiming that God "probably" does not exist. See<br />http://richarddawkins.net/articles/486195-atheist-billboards-appear-in-new-zealand.<br /><br />I was struck by the fervor and enthusiasm of Dawkins' reception. Seems really odd.George Mitchellnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-39945119409458570552010-11-30T11:29:08.151-06:002010-11-30T11:29:08.151-06:00Who said what exists? I didn't say there was ...Who said what exists? I didn't say there was a God. When someone asserts there's a God, I say there's no evidence. You've got a definition of God we can use for this exercise, Prof. McAdams? <br /><br />What's that, you say there's a particular God with a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mII6-IyaT3o" rel="nofollow">part-human Son</a>, and a cadre of came-before and came-after fellow intercessory magicians? I don't see no God, no how, no where. You do? Who is asserting what here?Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-8833003353372135792010-11-30T10:10:10.276-06:002010-11-30T10:10:10.276-06:00I'd have expected better quality sophistry fro...I'd have expected better quality sophistry from a professor at a Catholic university. Do you see any assertion in Mr. Foust's comment, professor? Although Foust hasn't actually made an assertion, McAdams accuses him of wanting his "biases" to hold the privileged position. And he doesn't even address the substantive point Foust made. If I didn't know better, I'd say this is just the sort of cheap dialogue the Shark deplores. <br /><br />For the record requiring some proof for an assertion such as, "god exists" is not, in an of itself, an assertion requiring proof.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-23472849084512927562010-11-30T09:35:09.884-06:002010-11-30T09:35:09.884-06:00In your courts, classrooms, or cloisters, who has ...<i>In your courts, classrooms, or cloisters, who has the burden of proof? I think it's the one making the assertion.</i><br /><br />Amazing!<br /><br />Foust seems not to realize that saying that God does not exist is an assertion.<br /><br />But for the agnostics: saying that we lack evidence to know that God exists is an assertion.<br /><br />Foust wants his secular biases to be the privileged position.John McAdamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04843727752066511266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-24765009448979279032010-11-28T14:25:22.780-06:002010-11-28T14:25:22.780-06:00I'll take Unproven Metaphors for $200, Alex.
...I'll take Unproven Metaphors for $200, Alex.<br /><br />Wow, you or Luther or Aquinas can't even tell us what God is, and now you want us to prove He doesn't exist? And if we can't to your satisfaction, therefore He exists? And the atheists are the confused, non-rational ones?<br /><br />In your courts, classrooms, or cloisters, who has the burden of proof? I think it's the one making the assertion.Display Namehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15842340986220388709noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-60048287315153053632010-11-27T12:53:26.592-06:002010-11-27T12:53:26.592-06:00Do you lament Christian evangelism? Do you complai...Do you lament Christian evangelism? Do you complain when Latter-Day Saints, Jehovah's Witnesses or television preachers or any other religious folks proselytize?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com