tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post8505779836533640109..comments2023-11-03T06:35:48.003-05:00Comments on Shark and Shepherd: Will the lawsuit against the Chief Justice amendment succeed?Rick Esenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-47707163163908762602015-04-11T10:54:39.488-05:002015-04-11T10:54:39.488-05:00... and a much better attorney, judging by the rec...... and a much better attorney, judging by the record.David Blaskahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14746169836462702879noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-68653916572094681002015-04-10T19:43:45.113-05:002015-04-10T19:43:45.113-05:00Of course she's wrong, she's only a suprem...Of course she's wrong, she's only a supreme court chief judge and you are a what? Shill for right wing money?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-79173760098553200662015-04-10T14:24:13.032-05:002015-04-10T14:24:13.032-05:00It seems like the chief justice doesn't unders...It seems like the chief justice doesn't understand the word "rights". Government officials don't have rights, they have an authorization by the citizens to operate within their constitutional bounds. We can change their bounds by amending the constitution, as was done in this case.<br />This is what it means when we say that the government operates with the consent of the people.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com