tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post2873590388526125787..comments2023-11-03T06:35:48.003-05:00Comments on Shark and Shepherd: Only One Wisconsin Now but so much sillinessRick Esenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-4099034540717533192007-03-30T17:20:00.000-05:002007-03-30T17:20:00.000-05:00I suspect it may be Ziegler's insistence on callin...I suspect it may be Ziegler's insistence on calling Clifford an immigration lawyer that triggered the asbestos lawyer description. Lesson: Don't play with fire unless you're wearing an asbestos suit.xoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08846380556286798188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-14132449359771248202007-03-30T15:26:00.000-05:002007-03-30T15:26:00.000-05:00So we agree that Ziegler is not a restraintist jud...So we agree that Ziegler is not a restraintist judge as you would like to see in the Supreme Court. Does this mean that you do not support either candidate? <BR/><BR/>I think it's over 200 cases revealed now with Ziegler conflicts. You're an intelligent man, you know that is just the tip of the ice berg. <BR/><BR/>I do not know the people of One Wisconsin Now, but I think they are doing us all a terrific service. Personally, I hope they continue the role their playing even after the election. Judicial corruption is something that should be stamped out immediatedly. (The German Justice ministry excuse was that it seemed like small things at first)<BR/><BR/>You seem to be well intentioned but are caught up in win/lose, instead of good/bad, right/wrong.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-68291398521813156352007-03-30T13:43:00.000-05:002007-03-30T13:43:00.000-05:00Anon - Since I don't know who you are, I don't kno...Anon - Since I don't know who you are, I don't know if you have asked this before or read this blog but: <I>How many times do I have to say that I do not think it is "permissable" for a judge to ignore applicable rules and I have repeatedly said that, based on what we know, Judge Ziegler was wrong in, at least, the nondefaulted West Bend cases.</I> As far as I know, there were two such cases. She definitely should have disclosed or recused in those cases and probably even recused (there being no one to disclose to) in the defaulted cases. I have not criticized One Wisconsin for saying so.<BR/><BR/>But they have said a lot more than that and some of those larger claims are worth criticizing. Because Judge Ziegler did not follow the rules in these West Bend cases does not mean that any thing further that anyone says about her must be correct.<BR/><BR/>I am unaware of any response to my criticisms. That may be because, you know, who cares what I say, but I am unaware of any response that could be made. <BR/><BR/>One Wisconsin's "statistical analysis" does not suggest that she improperly favored West Bend and attacking her because she represented an asbestos defendant is silly.Rick Esenberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07280070509167910367noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20692053.post-71804371677965407372007-03-30T13:24:00.000-05:002007-03-30T13:24:00.000-05:00Rick - I still want to know how a restraintist jud...Rick - I still want to know how a restraintist judge (as you call them) would contruct the constitution to make it permissable for a judge (Ziegler) to violate the rules that are meant to assure people of a fair judicial system? <BR/><BR/>Ziegler is applying for the job and we should know what she has done. I've read a number press releases from One Wisconsin Now and have found them to be very good. <BR/><BR/>I suppose it bothers you not to be on the right side of this issue so you want to shoot the messenger.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com