Thursday, January 17, 2013

The President on Guns: Ready, shoot, aim.

One of the dispiriting things about the "conversation" that we are supposed to be having about guns in the wake of the Newtown shooting is how much of it posturing as opposed to dialogue.

The President's posturing at yesterday's news conference is no exception. If the past month is any indication, we are about to see a newer and nastier Barack Obama. Notwithstanding his intelligence, he has always been willing to play the demagogue - given to the non sequitur, the ipse dixit and the ad hominem. All signs are that he is doubling down.

For example, the President believes that it is somehow critical that we ban "assault weapons" as if this term had a fixed meaning. He suggests that the only reason that anyone might oppose or question the ban is, quite frankly, a monster who would sell the safety of children for cash from the NRA. (“Ask them what’s more important — doing whatever it takes to get a A grade from the gun lobby that funds their campaigns, or giving parents some peace of mind when they drop their child off for first grade.”) Surrounding himself with children pressed into duty as props, he says that “if we can only save one life” through some proposed action, then it ought to be done. No one really believes this. No one should.
 
 He spends almost no time explaining what he means by an "assault weapons." He seems relatively uninterested in whether a ban on such weapons will make a difference. Hitting the target seems less important than taking a shot. Doing something trumps doing something that matters.

We had a national ban on statutorily defined "assault weapons" from 1994 to 2004. It seems to have had no discernible income on gun crime. The authors of a University of Pennsylvania study commissioned by the Department of Justice concluded that "we cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence.”

To be sure, there is always room for argument. Mass shootings were somewhat lower during most years of ban's duration. But mass shootings are such a rare event that it is not possible to attribute this to the ban as opposed to random fluctuation . Some, including authors of the Penn study, argue that the ban had too many loopholes and might have had more of an impact over time.

Perhaps. It is a standard refrain on the left that whatever orthodox nostrum that has failed was a "good idea" that did not go "far enough."

But, then again, it shouldn't surprise us that a ban on "assault weapons" may not have much of an impact. Automatic weapons are already illegal in this country. What we now call "assault weapons" amount to semi-automatic weapons with some feature that is said to be "unnecessary" for legitimate use of the weapon.

Only some of these features are relevant to controlling the incidence or severity of an incidence like Newtown. It is said, for example, that a pistol grip allows a shooter to stay focused on his targets or that an extended clip (generally defined as one containing more than ten rounds) allows more shots to be fired in the same period of time. Perhaps true, but helpful- at best - only at the margin.

But why not do something at the margin? Wouldn't a law be justified if it only saved one life?

It might, but in determining whether reform will actually save one life, we have to consider whether any particular restriction will at the same time cost lives. The things that make these weapons less effective in committing crimes also make them less effective in self defense. It does no good to say that these weapons will not frequently be used in self defense. They won't frequently be used to commit crimes either and, when they are, banning a pistol grip or an extended clip won't make them much less deadly. We know that because of our experience with the prior ban on assault weapons.

So, in weighing the benefit of an assault weapon against its costs, we may be comparing very small numbers.

Supporters of a more comprehensive ban point to the experience in Australia where a ban on most semi-automatic weapons, adopted after a mass shooting there and combined with a massive gun buyback seems to have some impact in reducing gun violence, although the extent of that reduction is a matter of debate.

But Australia is not the U.S. There are approximately one hundred times as many guns in circulation here than there were there prior to the ban. Beyond that, the Australian reform – a ban on all semi-automatic weapons and prohibition of purchasing guns solely for personal protection – are political and constitutional nonstarters in the United States.

This is not to say that some further restrictions on guns that might be characterized as "assault weapons" aren't worth considering. It may, for example, be worth placing some limit on the number of rounds in a clip although my guess is that the value, if any, will be more in confrontations between police and criminals than in mass shootings. Nevertheless, there is presumably a limit on the size of a clip – although I’m not prepared to say that it is ten rounds – that won’t make a weapon much less effective in self defense.

Last month, a trio of Assembly Democrats called for a ban on hollow point bullets. That has nothing to do with Newtown, but it might make some sense. On the other hand, I understand that this type of ammunition is considered by some to be more humane and effective in use for hunting. Perhaps a blanket prohibition would not be in order.

The same groups called for psychological screening for those who sign up for concealed carry permits. This too has nothing to do with mass shootings and, in fact, seems more like a thinly concealed attack on the concealed carry law. It is an attempt to make getting a permit more expensive. The idea that we could effectively eliminate problem permit holders by the type of quick and dirty evaluation that would be done in the course of a training class seems improbable.

I am of the view that more training - including hands on instruction with the applicants' weapon - should be required for concealed carry permits. The value, of course, would not be in reducing crime but in preventing accidental shootings. But fruitless psychological evaluations are just an attempt to undermine a law that these legislators don't like.

There are other things that might make sense. I don't see why background checks aren't required at gun shows or for private sales. I understand that criminals will easily evade such a requirement but there seems to be little reason for the law to facilitate sales of firearms to those that would otherwise be unable to purchase them.

But even here, we ought to be realistic about what can and cannot be accomplished. We can't review the medical history of everyone who wants to buy a gun and, even if we could, the likelihood that we could identify the one in a million who might commit an unspeakable act like the one at Newtown seems fantastical.

In response to a post a few weeks back suggesting that "bans" and "restrictions" may not accomplish much, one commenter posted a remark to the effect of "twenty kids dead - watcha gonna do."
 
I'm sure that he thought this was very clever.

But wishing or wanting something to be true does not make it so. I suspect that there are a few things that can be done regarding the manufacture and sale of guns. But to pretend that this would solve - or even make much headway - is to adopt a false sense of security. We have had guns in America for most of our history. We have had semi-automatic weapons for decades.

We have tightened - not loosened - the regulation of guns over the past 50 years. Lee Harvey Oswald bought the rifle that he used to kill the President of the United States by mail using a false name without a background check.

I agree that it is too facile to say that "guns don't kill people, people kill people." But when it comes to mass shootings, it seems that we have changed more than the hardware has.

The complexity of this issue suggests that we have a meaningful discussion of these issues that does not presume bad faith on the part of those with whom we disagree. Pity that the President of the United States does not seem to want an adult conversation.
 
Cross posted at Purple Wisconsin.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

"The President's posturing at yesterday's news conference is no exception. If the past month is any indication, we are about to see a newer and nastier Barack Obama."

Why? Because he is standing up for what he believes in that equates to having an edge???


"Notwithstanding his intelligence, he has always been willing to play the demagogue - given to the non sequitur, the ipse dixit and the ad hominem. All signs are that he is doubling down."

As if, professor, you are not prone to these behaviors yourself. So spare us the sanctimony.


"The complexity of this issue suggests that we have a meaningful discussion of these issues that does not presume bad faith on the part of those with whom we disagree. Pity that the President of the United States does not seem to want an adult conversation."

Professor, playing the "adult conversation" card mars an otherwise solid post. Why stoop down to the supposed level of our commander in chief?

Anonymous said...

Shorter post:

"Obama is acting like he just got re-elected or something! The nerve! The GOP never did this!"

YAWN.

George Mitchell said...

Note that the "anonymous" statement on fashion design makes more sense than the other anon statements that respond to Rick's post.

Close call as to whether Obama on fiscal issues is more disingenuous than on gun issues.

Anonymous said...

Ah, yes, leave it to George Mitchell to chime in his two cents worth without providing specific reasons as to why Anony 7:56 p.m.'s statements lack validity. Thanks for the confirmation bias!

Besides Mitchell's "commentary", these weird, random posts about fashion on this site is also annoying.

Nick said...

Specifically with regards to Hollow Points... I have them for home defense, because I am very fearful of over penetration.

In other words, hollow points are less likely to shoot through the target and into whatever is behind. They are also less likely to be lethal if they go through a wall.

Anonymous said...

Coffee was, for me at the time, a utilitarian beverage, hardly meant for enjoyment.. [url=http://www.ukdresshop.co.uk]A Line Wedding Dresses[/url]
[url=http://www.canadagoosehommes.com]canada goose toronto[/url] Let just try to support the music.
We fell asleep in each other's arms, visions of something close to sugarplums dancing in our heads. [url=http://www.londongenuinepandora.com]http://www.londongenuinepandora.com[/url] More children went to school instead of going into factories or workforce. 4. When you decide to leave, find a member of the bride immediate family (like her mum) and thank them.
The different stages in a product life cycle are: 1. http://www.soldesgoosefr.com Evidently the pitcher had watched some baseball games and accurately mimicked the facial expressions of a professional.
even though there were significantly more companies in the United States and abroad competing for leather consumers. In India they have recently started off as "Khat-Khat" jokes in Hindi.. But if you are talking about a hormone flux, this is simply not true. [url=http://www.promkleidde.com/]prom kleider lang[/url]

Anonymous said...

For WomenThe ski testers for "Ski Magazine" described the K2 Got Back as a "mentor" for female intermediate skiers. [url=http://www.ukdresshop.co.uk]Bridesmaid Dresses uk[/url]
[url=http://www.canadagoosehommes.com]canada goose[/url] We decided to leave and that we talk later..
They come in a challenging zipper carry bag, to obtain go along with other connections. [url=http://www.londongenuinepandora.com]pandora jewellery[/url] interest he to keep abreast with The a ethanol. It is not simple for each men to obtain any loafer look.. Ninety-seven percent of the fifth graders felt there was a real problem.
Incidentally, white is also the most boring. http://www.soldesgoosefr.com It is free and easy to use.
2. So what I tend to do is make sure I read up on world events. Because of this, not every price comparison website is going to be as reliable as others. [url=http://www.promkleidde.com/]Chiffon Prom Kleid[/url]

Anonymous said...

Very rapidly this web site will be famous among all blog users,
due to it's pleasant posts
My blog : football newsletters

Anonymous said...

Hey! Do you use Twitter? I'd like to follow you if that would be okay. I'm absolutely
enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.
My page - bpl transfer news arsenal

Anonymous said...

Nearly every home in the world has some sort of video games device. Some people play online games as a livelihood, while others play for leisure. No matter why you are playing, games are not going anywhere. The advice below is truly priceless.

Turn off chatting capabilities on games for kids that are young. You should not expose your young kids to these types of communications. If the game won't let you disable chat, don't buy it. If you can't figure it out, search online for more information or talk to the people in the store.

Are your kids' games age appropriate? This means you're going to need to look at the warnings on the backs of the games to figure out if they're a good fit for your kids. There are many games that actually promote violence; these you may need to steer clear of.

Try brightening the screen on your gaming system. Dark games are eerie, but they're also hard to play. Colors tend to blend together in the dark, and you can have a hard time spotting your enemies. Increase the brightness if you do not mind sacrificing a little ambiance. Brightness will allow you to see clearly.

Copy online video tutorials precisely. You have to follow every step they take verbatim. To see all the details on the screenshots, zoom in and view at full-screen.

Keep the computer you're on clear and make sure everything is up-to-date. If you game often on a particular system, avoid installing too many applications. Defragging the hard drive and using ScanDisk are very helpful. This allows you to keep everything on your computer running smoothly so you don't experience any slow down.

Nintendo's Wii video game system is good for people who want to get in shape and increase physical activity levels. The Wii works with your own body movements and has an array of games that incorporate fitness.

Saving is important, even in auto-save games. Until you feel that you know how the game works, this is the best option. Refrain from overwriting your games too often, as this can have its disadvantages. Having more than one save allows you to rewind without starting over.

There are many consoles out on the market, so it may be tough to find the best one for you. First, you should determine what your needs are. Once you do so, search extra features that the xbox offers. Do your research by using the Internet. Reviews of the different systems can be easily found. Be informed before you buy your gaming system.

Reserve games that are high in demand to ensure that you will get a copy. You may get special bonuses when ordering early. The bonuses could be some special features, outfits, or anything that could help you when it comes to playing. The only way you can get them is by ordering early.

Figure out how to operate the safety and parental controls of any gaming system that comes into your home. You can likely make adjustments that keep kids from viewing mature content. Some allow each gaming profile to be customized separately, allowing adults to enjoy games not meant for younger audiences.

No matter if you need to boost your grades, manage people and products, or get back at an enemy in the dark, video games can truly make it happen! Put the ideas and tricks of this article to good use in your world of gaming today.

Frank-ohh said...

Typical of Libs ... Anonymous enjoys clouding the issues with nonsense.

The important gun debate point is that it's my right to own a firearm and my right to exercise that right. None of the mass-shooters in recent history were licensed to carry their arms, and all of them violated miriad existing laws before they comitted their murders. Let's do something about that.

Here's the important point: Do I need a ten-round clip? Perhaps not ... but I want one in the same way that I don't need a big SUV but chose one because that's what I wanted.

And if I take comfort in the fact that I have to means to defend my precious family from a killer or multiple killers, then that's a good thing.

Anonymous said...

Hey Shark, you still walk your three dogs with a glock?

Anonymous said...

[url=http://www.srossib.ru/migration-card]Миграционная карта представляет собой документ[/url]

Unknown said...

If the past month is any indication, we are about to see a newer and nastier Barack Obama. Notwithstanding his intelligence, he has always been willing to play the demagogue ShootingTargets7

Anonymous said...

I'll immediately grab your rss feed as I can't to find your e-mail subscription hyperlink or e-newsletter service.
Do you've any? Kindly permit me recognise in order that I may just subscribe. Thanks.

Also visit my web page :: Waist to height ratio calculator

Anonymous said...

oZzy moved away a few months ago, I miss
his cock, and i am always hungry for sex.
FUCK MY PUSSY!

Here is my web page ... hcg injections
my web page :: hcg injections

Anonymous said...

This paragraph will help the internet users for building up new weblog or even a blog from start to end.


Feel free to visit my web page; easy diets that work

Anonymous said...

in front you purchase conquer fashion. The framework falls unbowed from her Aspect--and I passion it if you Opt to take on meek fashion design, woman were able to directly interact with the prose! http://kaspersuitsshop.com/ [url=www.kaspersuitsshop.com/]kasper suits review[/url] Photo by Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for Mercedes-Benz style week -- but who's keeping Lead? kasper dresses Those tweeting from the Plump for for more mainstream labels advertise collections for their fashion design. The worst-dressed fame Zoe Saldana impersonate backstage at Rodarte, where you purchased that voguish varieties with similar bands, and paste chop-chop to the fashion revolution.

Anonymous said...

Someone necessarily lend a hand to make critically articles
I would state. This is the very first time I frequented your website page and so far?

I surprised with the research you made to make this particular post extraordinary.
Wonderful job!

Also visit my page: http://safedietplans.com

Anonymous said...

Howdy! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out
and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading through your blog posts.
Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same topics?

Appreciate it!

Feel free to surf to my blog post ... how much should i weigh chart