Saturday, October 31, 2009

More on the recusal rules

I didn't have a lot of time to explain why I think the state supreme court seems to have gotten it right in rejecting a proposed rule changes advanced by the League of Women Voters and retired Justice William Bablitch and in adopting changes advanced by WMC and the Wisconsin Realtors Association.

The LWV proposal was always a nonstarter. It would have required recusal whenever a party or a lawyer in a case had made a contribution in excess of $1000.00 or engaged in a "mass communication" on behalf of a judicial candidate. A mass communication could have consisted of as few as 50 phone calls, letters or e-mails. That would have made it impossible to raise a meaningful sum of money in judicial campaigns in all but the smallest counties. It was a massive assault on public participation and it is proposals like this that have rendered groups like Common Cause, the LWV and the WCD largely irrelevant in making public policy.

A proposed amendment by former Justice William Bablitch was more reasonable. It would have required recusal for direct or indirect contributions amounting to $10,000or more(cash or in kind) by an attorney or party with a direct or indirect interest in the case.

I think this still goes too far - particularly in large counties and definitely for state wide races. Because it applies to "in kind" expenditures, I would think that it would require recusal for any significant GOTV effort or any significant communication of an endorsement by an advocacy organization. It would, again, make it extremely difficult for their to be significant public participation in judicial elections and would strongly tilt the playing field in favor of incumbents.

This is not to say that a $10,000 contribution or expenditure might not create a circumstance in which recusal is appropriate. It might - particularly in a circuit court race. But I don't think it is fair to say that such a contribution would always create a potential for bias such that recusal should be warranted notwithstanding a judge's subjective determination that she can decide the matter impartially.

But the largest problem, I think, is the suggestion that an "indirect interest" might create cause for recusal. While I would be reluctant to say that can never be so, I am concerned that - without further definition - it may be read to imply a broad duty to recuse based upon supporter's ideological interest. Without getting into the details, this might be at odds with the what I believe to be the best application of first amendment jurisprudence to this area of the law, i.e., that the predispsotion to a particular legal position is not improper bias.

Justice Bablitch himself conceded that the term "indirect support" was problemantic and in need of further definition. But I think there is a problem with the endorsement of recusal standards that read more broadly than they can or should be applied. They permit unwarranted attacks on the legitimacy of the courts and the integrity of judges.

And that brings us to the rule changes that the Court did adopt. They most certainly do not amount to the Court "thumbing its nose" at the United States Supreme Court decision in Caperton. Although they might be improved, I think that the are properly read as perfectly consistent with that decision. They do not mean that contributions and independent expenditures can never create a potential for bias such that recusal is in order.

Rather, they make clear that recusal cannot be required "solely" due to lawful endorsements, contributions and independent expenditures. That seems right to me and saying so may have been necessary given some of the irresponsible calls for recusal made by groups like the WDC and OWN. The idea that Annette Ziegler ought to have recused herself because WMC filed an amicus brief in a case was wholly without merit and would have created an unworkable precedent.

I don't think that the rule means that contributions and expenditures are to be ignored in assessing a question of recusal or that there cannot be circumstances in which they do create a potential for bias in which recusal is necessary. But the mere fact that contributions and expenditures have been made cannot, without more, require recusal.

Having said that, it's not clear to me that the adopted rules could not be improved. They could be clarified to, for example, more clearly state what, at least in my view, they are intended to mean (e.g., making clear that they do not say lawful expenditures can never warrant recusal). They might be extended to offer more guidance. But they are, I think, better rules than the alternatives before the court.

Cross posted at Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Has there ever been a Wisconsin Judge at any level that has recused themselves from a case?

Rick Esenberg said...

Happens all the time.

Anonymous said...

It would seem to me that if it happens all the time that they're at least unwritten policies that could be turned into rules. The judges that are recusing themselves should be making the rules.

John Foust said...

This is not to say that a $10,000 contribution or expenditure might not create a circumstance in which recusal is appropriate. It might - particularly in a circuit court race.

You seem to be saying we should be more concerned if the contribution in question was a significant fraction of the candidate's fundraising. Instead of a fixed figure, we should consider the proportion instead?

Anonymous said...

please don't say demo accounts i have many i'm talking about training in trading stocks and forex by computer. What is the best software to learn trading stocks and forex.
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_g8RMKfk5w]unlock iphone[/url]

Anonymous said...

скачать порно лесбийский секс
фото архив журнала playboy
порно изнасилования смотреть бесплатно
porno fi
влагалище ебут
бесплатный просмотр порно видео
пенза порнуха
порно хилтон бесплатно
суки порно фото
посмотреть порно видео без скачивания

Anonymous said...

maternityacupressure -
maverick money makers -
meet your sweet -
muscle gaining secrets -
muscle gain truth -
natural cancer treatments -
niche review templates -
nyhms warcraft guides -
pappa pc -
pc booster -
pc optimizer pro -
pc secret formula -
pda flix -
privacy control -
public records pro -
publicrecordspro -
push button ecover -
reg defense -
reg genie -
registry easy -
registry genius -
registry smart -
registry winner -
registry winner download -
reverse mobile -
richard mackenzie direct -
rocket japanese -
rotator cuff training -
save my marriage today -
secrets book -
silent sales machine -

Anonymous said...

spyware cease -
super affiliate handbook -
the 11 forgotten laws -
the bad breath report -
thebadbreathreport -
the diet solution program -
thedietsolutionprogram -
the power pause -
tmj help -
tonsil stones remedies -
top secret fat loss secret -
turbulence training -
twitter rockstar -
uncle sams money -
underground hypnosis -
vince del monte fitness -
vincedelmontefitness -
warcraft millionaire -
warcraft wealth -
warp speed fat loss -
webcomp analyst -
wedding speech 4u -
win back love -
your software website -
zox pro -
zygor guides -
2012 offical count down -
2 stock trading -
500 in 15 -
7 minute miracle -
affiliate cash ultimatum -

Anonymous said...

tips getting pregnant -
top secret fat loss secret -
turbulence training -
tycoon cashflow -
ultimate blogging theme -
underground traffic blueprint -
wedding speeches for all -
white hat copy cat blueprint -
wii fix guide -
wii unlock plus -
wow schools -
wp remix -
xoco slim -
xtreme fat loss diet -
yeast infection no more -
yummy arts -
500 love making tips -
acid alkaline diet -
acne no more -
advanced defrag -
adware alert -
adware bot -
affiliate elite -
anti spyware -
anti spyware bot -
article bully -
art of approaching -
auto pilot profits -
bbq book -
blogging in action -
body building revealed -

Anonymous said...

warp speed fat loss -
web traffic machines -
wedding speech 4u -
wind plans -
xp repair pro -
your fun business -
zygor guides -
500 love making tips -
acid alkaline diet -
acne no more -
advanced defrag -
anti spyware bot -
art of approaching -
banish tinnitus -
beat eczema -
blood pressure normalized -
burn the fat -
burnthefat -
conversational hypnosis -
conversationalhypnosis -
cpa arbitrage -
creative date ideas -
debt free in three -
digital background -
dirty talking guide -
discus fish secrets -
duplicate file cleaner -
dw insider -
earth 4 energy -
earth4energy -
easy tv soft -