Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Post-election question

One of the things that surprised me was that Mac-Mac got 35% of the vote in the DA's race. I could be wrong, but I don't think the moonbat vote in Milwaukee County is that high. I think that has to suggest a significant anti-McCann sentiment. Given that I suspect there was substantial crossover by Republicans (not a huge - but still a significant - group in Milwaukee County) to vote for Clarke, it may be even larger that Mac-Mac's vote would suggest.

Does this mean that independent Lew Wasserman might get some traction? Can he appeal to conservatives? Could it be that the DA's race is not quite over?

3 comments:

steveegg said...

There are that many moonbats in Milwaukee County. Take a look at the 7th Senate District results, and note that an "ex-"candidate that is likely to become ineligible for public office inside of 6 months took 26% of the vote.

Also, Chisholm ran as a "semi-tough on crime guy" (not that I believe that), and that Mac-Mac's message was basically "the only criminals are the cops". Somehow I don't think that Wasserman can pull off a "tough on crime" campaign while keeping a straight face.

In short, it's over.

Dennis York said...

Dennis York is an idiot. I bet he wasn't even wearing pants when he wrote that post.

Dennis York said...

How about that - I really am an idiot. Left a comment on the wrong post. Sheesh.